Re: Warner Props

An archive of all the messages posted in the old Fairchild Club Yahoo Group. It is not possible to start a new topic in this forum (please use one of the other forums for new threads), but you can continue to post on existing topics.
Post Reply
mcclurebill@rocketmail.com
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:55 pm

Warner Props

Post by mcclurebill@rocketmail.com »

'Wondering if there are opinions about props, diameters and pitch, for Warners, specifically the 145. What static/takeoff rpms should be seen. How about Aeromatics.....any out there? What has been the experience with those?

Thanks.

Bill McC'
Hugh Loewenhardt
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Warner Props

Post by Hugh Loewenhardt »

'--- On Tue, 12/1/09, mcclurebill@rocketmail.com wrote:
> From: mcclurebill@rocketmail.com
> Subject: [fairchildclub] Warner Props
> To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 12:10 AM
>
> Bill, Most,if not,all the infomation you seek regarding prop selection and RPM data for specific applications is available from the various propeller manufacture's technical literature as well as aircraft type certificates. Model specifications for wooden Sensenich propellers for various Warner 145 engine/aircraft combinations are on their web site or I can send you a copy. I have a Warner 145 series 40 engine and I know that prop selection depends on various factors such as the propeller hub (taper vs spline) and the aircraft, definitely not opinions. Contact me if you want a copy of the Sensenich document. Hugh (860)535-1699
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Wondering if there are opinions about props,
> diameters and pitch, for Warners, specifically the 145. What
> static/takeoff rpms should be seen. How about Aeromatics..
> ...any out there? What has been the experience with those?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Bill McC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
'
mcclurebill@rocketmail.com
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:55 pm

Re: Warner Props

Post by mcclurebill@rocketmail.com »

'Thanks for that. I suppose I should have said which props amongst the approved options are working out the best for the members. Kind of a black art, I think, since there a few manufacturers and the criteria are not necessarily the same amongst them. I will look at the Sensenich list online. I am working with a 145 50A, splined shaft. I think I'd like to find a suitable Aeromatic if available.

Bill McC
--- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, Hugh Loewenhardt wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 12/1/09, mcclurebill@... wrote:
>
> > From: mcclurebill@...
> > Subject: [fairchildclub] Warner Props
> > To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 12:10 AM
> >
> > Bill, Most,if not,all the infomation you seek regarding prop selection and RPM data for specific applications is available from the various propeller manufacture's technical literature as well as aircraft type certificates. Model specifications for wooden Sensenich propellers for various Warner 145 engine/aircraft combinations are on their web site or I can send you a copy. I have a Warner 145 series 40 engine and I know that prop selection depends on various factors such as the propeller hub (taper vs spline) and the aircraft, definitely not opinions. Contact me if you want a copy of the Sensenich document. Hugh (860)535-1699
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Wondering if there are opinions about props,
> > diameters and pitch, for Warners, specifically the 145. What
> > static/takeoff rpms should be seen. How about Aeromatics..
> > ...any out there? What has been the experience with those?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill McC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
'
jhed9253@aol.com
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:49 am

Re: Warner Props

Post by jhed9253@aol.com »

'Check with Kent at: info@aeromatic.com
He is the man.




-----Original Message-----
From: mcclurebill@rocketmail.com
To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 1, 2009 2:07 pm
Subject: [fairchildclub] Re: Warner Props






Thanks for that. I suppose I should have said which props amongst the approved options are working out the best for the members. Kind of a black art, I think, since there a few manufacturers and the criteria are not necessarily the same amongst them. I will look at the Sensenich list online. I am working with a 145 50A, splined shaft. I think I'd like to find a suitable Aeromatic if available.

Bill McC
--- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, Hugh Loewenhardt wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 12/1/09, mcclurebill@... wrote:
>
> > From: mcclurebill@...
> > Subject: [fairchildclub] Warner Props
> > To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 12:10 AM
> >
> > Bill, Most,if not,all the infomation you seek regarding prop selection and RPM data for specific applications is available from the various propeller manufacture's technical literature as well as aircraft type certificates. Model specifications for wooden Sensenich propellers for various Warner 145 engine/aircraft combinations are on their web site or I can send you a copy. I have a Warner 145 series 40 engine and I know that prop selection depends on various factors such as the propeller hub (taper vs spline) and the aircraft, definitely not opinions. Contact me if you want a copy of the Sensenich document. Hugh (860)535-1699
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Â
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Wondering if there are opinions about props,
> > diameters and pitch, for Warners, specifically the 145. What
> > static/takeoff rpms should be seen. How about Aeromatics..
> > ...any out there? What has been the experience with those?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill McC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
'
vampsqu
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:08 pm

Re: Warner Props

Post by vampsqu »

'--- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, "mcclurebill@..." wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for that. I suppose I should have said which props amongst the approved options are working out the best for the members. Kind of a black art, I think, since there a few manufacturers and the criteria are not necessarily the same amongst them. I will look at the Sensenich list online. I am working with a 145 50A, splined shaft. I think I'd like to find a suitable Aeromatic if available.
>
> Bill McC
>
> --- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, Hugh Loewenhardt > --- On Tue, 12/1/09, mcclurebill@ wrote:
> >
> > > From: mcclurebill@
> > > Subject: [fairchildclub] Warner Props
> > > To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 12:10 AM
> > >
> > > Bill, Most,if not,all the infomation you seek regarding prop selection and RPM data for specific applications is available from the various propeller manufacture's technical literature as well as aircraft type certificates. Model specifications for wooden Sensenich propellers for various Warner 145 engine/aircraft combinations are on their web site or I can send you a copy. I have a Warner 145 series 40 engine and I know that prop selection depends on various factors such as the propeller hub (taper vs spline) and the aircraft, definitely not opinions. Contact me if you want a copy of the Sensenich document. Hugh (860)535-1699
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Wondering if there are opinions about props,
> > > diameters and pitch, for Warners, specifically the 145. What
> > > static/takeoff rpms should be seen. How about Aeromatics..
> > > ...any out there? What has been the experience with those?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Mc

Bill :
as reguards your question about who to overhaul a warner 145 :
Please contact Mr. Charley Bell ( F-22 )
He has a frend who can do them I believe !

Tim B.

> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
'
Post Reply