Re: Russian or Chinese Radial on F24W?
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:04 pm
'For those of you who are bringing a derelict back from the grave, the experimental route looks pretty good. In this day and age, its not like the experimental category limits the usefulness of the F24. In fact, it increases the safety of operation. If you’re a die-hard purist antiquer and you absolutely need a certified airplane, you’ll just have to be satisfied with a Ranger or a Warner, I guess. No problem with that. But if it comes down to keeping these things flying with round engines, the Russian radials are a good choice. If the original designers were around and had a choice to replace the Warner, I’d bet it would be the Russian radials.
From: Michael Denest
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:10 PM
To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [fairchildclub] Re: Russian or Chinese Radial on F24W?
Ditto. The engineering and FAA conformity requirements would not make it worth the effort for one or two airplanes. Installing a Ranger would be easy. It's already approved; all you need is a FAA Form 337 Major Alteration using the Type Certificate Data Sheet as approved data.
From: Michael Denest
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:10 PM
To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [fairchildclub] Re: Russian or Chinese Radial on F24W?
Ditto. The engineering and FAA conformity requirements would not make it worth the effort for one or two airplanes. Installing a Ranger would be easy. It's already approved; all you need is a FAA Form 337 Major Alteration using the Type Certificate Data Sheet as approved data.
'On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:07, David Keen wrote:
> Trying to certify a non TC engine would be cost prohibitive.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 27, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Katz wrote:
>
> > At
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]