'Stuart,
  
 I'm replacing the stamped ss three-into-one exhaust setup on my Fairchild, which experienced catastrophic failure while inroute to a antique aircraft fly-in here in Texas.  I lucked out in finding a set of 3-1 cs tubular headers off a 'parts' Ranger at the fly-in FBO's hanger!  Picture attached - hope you can see it...
  
 I really like the sound and looks of individual exhaust stacks.  However, without an existing 337, don't think the aesthetics are worth the hassle.  Cost/fit-up are certainly simplified over a 3-1 or 6-1 setup, but we've got certified aircraft, limiting our available options.  The photos Airy forwarded of single stacks looks cool!  Kindly send me the dimensions of your setup so that I can evaluate that option further on my spare engine.
  
 AMI (MN) will hopefully be fabbing my new ss tubular 3-1's this week.  Need to get buttoned back up and in the air!  Hoping I won't have to do too much 'adjustment' to get the flanges lined up with the exhaust studs...
  
 Regards,
 Bill C.
 
 
 
 To: 
fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
 From: 
burgess@mweb.co.za
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:20:10 +0200
 Subject: RE: [fairchildclub] Fairchild Exhaust
 
 
   
 
 
 Hi Bill
 
 I have a few single stacks on the engine that will go onto my F24 project
 when it is done. I am contemplating whether to fit singles or two 3 into 1
 branches which I think is more common, although the look and the sound of
 the singles tempt me. Bill if you need dimensions of a single stack to have
 them remade, let me know and I will draw one up for you.
 
 Cheers
 
 Stuart
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: 
fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Bill
 Sent: 30 November 2010 05:35 AM
 To: 
fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [fairchildclub] Fairchild Exhaust
 
 Has anyone installed single-exhaust stacks on their Ranger 6-440 engines,
 specifically on Fairchild 24R? 337?
 Bill C.
 
 ------------------------------------
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
  		 	   		  
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]'