Re: Nut torque

BOB DUNN · Post by **BOB DUNN** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:14 pm

'Does anyone know the torque value for the
five-sixteenth nuts for the Ranger crankcase..the ones
that secure the two halves of the crankcase?
Bob Dunn
bobaviator@yahoo.com

PS. I ordered a barrel of 120 oil for my Ranger a
couple of weeks ago from my local distributors only to
be told 120 is no longer being produced.
We'll probably have to go to 100 & pour in more oil.
Most of the radials, inlines etc of WW11 vintage use
the 120.
Also, does anyone know if 199LL is on the way out. I
heard something to this effect some time ago.

bd

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ'

Bob Haas · Post by **Bob Haas** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:01 pm

'Hey Bob where do you live or based? BH, N 46199

_____

From: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of BOB DUNN
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 6:14 PM
To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [fairchildclub] Nut torque

Does anyone know the torque value for the
five-sixteenth nuts for the Ranger crankcase..the ones
that secure the two halves of the crankcase?
Bob Dunn
bobaviator@yahoo. com

PS. I ordered a barrel of 120 oil for my Ranger a
couple of weeks ago from my local distributors only to
be told 120 is no longer being produced.
We'll probably have to go to 100 & pour in more oil.
Most of the radials, inlines etc of WW11 vintage use
the 120.
Also, does anyone know if 199LL is on the way out. I
heard something to this effect some time ago.

bd

__________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.

yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]'

Curt Kinchen · Post by **Curt Kinchen** » Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:11 pm

'One of my Ranger overhaul manuals had a table of standard torques to
use "unless otherwise specified". I don't have it handy, but it was
pretty much the same as the standard torque values shown in AC43-13,
which for 5/16 is 100-140 inch pounds. I used 120 if memory serves
correctly.

Regarding 120 being unavailable, I hadn't heard that. Although more
expensive lots of the big radial engine guys are using Phillips 25w60.

Curt Kinchen

--- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, BOB DUNN wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know the torque value for the
> five-sixteenth nuts for the Ranger crankcase..the ones
> that secure the two halves of the crankcase?
> Bob Dunn
> bobaviator@...
>
> PS. I ordered a barrel of 120 oil for my Ranger a
> couple of weeks ago from my local distributors only to
> be told 120 is no longer being produced.
> We'll probably have to go to 100 & pour in more oil.
> Most of the radials, inlines etc of WW11 vintage use
> the 120.
> Also, does anyone know if 199LL is on the way out. I
> heard something to this effect some time ago.
>
> bd
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
______________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>

'