Re: aeromatic on c-5 ranger

An archive of all the messages posted in the old Fairchild Club Yahoo Group. It is not possible to start a new topic in this forum (please use one of the other forums for new threads), but you can continue to post on existing topics.
Post Reply
m51rs
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:10 pm

aeromatic on c-5 ranger

Post by m51rs »

'Is someone using an Aeromatic on a c-5 ranger powered f-24?

Looking at the paperwork it seems this propeller is only approved for
the c-2 engine.

Any info appreciated,as I have ordered one but do not know how to get
it approved for installation.


regards,

Remko'
fchld
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 1:15 pm

Re: aeromatic on c-5 ranger

Post by fchld »

'Remko,

It has been done many times will get you the paperwork.

John Berendt
----- Original Message -----
From: m51rs
To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:15 AM
Subject: [fairchildclub] aeromatic on c-5 ranger


Is someone using an Aeromatic on a c-5 ranger powered f-24?

Looking at the paperwork it seems this propeller is only approved for
the c-2 engine.

Any info appreciated,as I have ordered one but do not know how to get
it approved for installation.

regards,

Remko






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
'
m51rs
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: aeromatic on c-5 ranger

Post by m51rs »

'John,

Many thanks!

Looking forward to it.

Regards,

Remko
--- In fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com, "fchld" wrote:
>
> Remko,
>
> It has been done many times will get you the paperwork.
>
> John Berendt
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: m51rs
> To: fairchildclub@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:15 AM
> Subject: [fairchildclub] aeromatic on c-5 ranger
>
>
> Is someone using an Aeromatic on a c-5 ranger powered f-24?
>
> Looking at the paperwork it seems this propeller is only approved
for
> the c-2 engine.
>
> Any info appreciated,as I have ordered one but do not know how to
get
> it approved for installation.
>
> regards,
>
> Remko
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
'
Post Reply